

Guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.Install using npm install crypt3 and use: Promise version using Q library var crypt = require('crypt3/q') crypt('6Xz7sS6fEmnWScMb6Ayf363e5cdqF4Kh', '$1$SrkubyRm$DEQU3KupUxt4yfhbK1HyV/'). John-1.7.8-allcuda-0.3.diff for much better performance at SHA-crypt:Īs you can see, Lukas reported something like 4800 c/s on GTX 460.Ĭonfused about mailing lists and their use? If you have an NVidia GPU and CUDA, you can try This is reasonable speed for a non-OpenMP build.
SHA512 CRYPT3 PASSWORD
> Loaded 5 password hashes with 5 different salts (generic crypt(3) ) john -format=crypt -wordlist=various.dic -session=test2 -rules t est2 SHA512 Encrypt/Decrypt is a free online tool for generating SHA512 hashes from strings and decrypting SHA512 hashes to strings. It is normal for SHA-crypt to be very slow. > Is the sha512 hash, or something else, to blame on this poor performance? To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Interested in SHA-crypt, let alone in the flavor built upon SHA-512 generatesha512-crypt.py This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. > Secondly, I'm very surprised at how slow my real world run is, compared to the performance test.Īs magnum pointed out, "-test" for "crypt" doesn't know you're > Not too long ago, it believe it was worked as format=sha512, or sha, or something like that. In fact, you did not need to specify -format at all. SHA-crypt is a higher levelĪlgorithm built upon SHA-512 or SHA-256. Raw SHA-512 is just that - SHA-512 as is (and it uses the SHA-512 message digest in place of the SHA-256 message digest. The format and algorithm are exactly the same, except for the following notable differences: it uses the modular crypt prefix 6, whereas SHA256-Crypt uses 5. (I don't know what the definition of RAW SHA512 is) SHA512-Crypt is defined by the same specification as SHA256-Crypt. Please contact to delete if infringement.
SHA512 CRYPT3 FULL
Full credit to hek2mgl for the password check he detailed in this answer. > First, I was surprised that the sha512 passwords are worked as format=crypt (hash encoding string length 98, type id $6), and not format=raw-sha512. password ENCRYPT ('userinput', password) ENCRYPT will grab the salt from the stored password and use this when checking userinput. You don't need OpenSSL for this, though - this stuff is available MD5, SHA256y SHA512), utilizará el más fuerte disponible. > My Solaris builds were compilied with the latest version of gcc, version 4.6.1 and latest version of opensll, version 1.0.0d. Si no proporciona un argumento para crypt.mksalt (podría aceptar crypt.METHODCRYPT. > -If anyone knows of a version of Linux that supports sha512 hashes, please reply to this message and let me know.-Īlmost all recent ones do (including popular ones such as Ubuntu andįedora), Owl is more of an exception than the rule here. SHA-crypt (it's part of glibc 2.7 and newer). You're right, except that recent enough versions of SUSE Linux do have You're referring to SHA-crypt support in the "crypt" format here. > This same test can't be performed on the Windows build, Linux build on Suse, Linux build on Owl, since it doesn't support the sha512 format. You mean you ran it against some SHA-512 -based crypt(3) hashes.

> I compiled JtR on Solaris and ran it against some Sha512 password hashes. To: Re: Terrible performance of sha512 (crypt) hash audit on/for Solaris

Hash Suite - Windows password security audit tool.
